Press enter to see results or esc to cancel.

Classification of Plants and Different Classification Systems (Case Study)

Classification of Plants – Work of Aristotle, Linnaeus, DE Jussieu, Darwin, Whittaker

Classification of Plants: The human dependence on plants for living forced him to recognize them. Whereas understand of interrelationship of plants forced him to classify and arrange them so as to manipulate the plants and plant products for his utilization in more befitting manner.

Aristotle and Theophrastus

Recognition and identification were an easy task as compared to the classification which needs an elaborate understanding of the topic. First logical and elaborate classification in the written from was done by Aristotle (384 – 322 B.C) and his pupil Theophrastus (372 – 287 B.C). They based their classification on apparent size of the plants visible by naked eye only. The categories included in their classification were Trees, Shrubs and herbs up to the twentieth century this classification hold firm. The medicinal use of herbs tilted the importance of plants in favor of herbs only. Beginning with the herbalists a realization was felt about the demerits of the previous classification. A general understanding was developed that most obvious characters cannot be most important one.

Linnaeus Classification System

The gradual recognition that the structure of the flower is of more fundamental importance in classification than are vegetative characters opened the gate for the “sexual system” of Linnaeus classification. Carl Linnaeus grouped plants according to the number of stamens and carpels, their union and their presence and absence in the flower. This system had the great benefits even for the unknown plants. According to this system when an unknown plant was discovered it cloud be easily inserted among when those already known. The plant kingdom was divided into 25 classes by Linnaeus.

One of Linnaeus classes CRYPTOGAMIA includes plants with concealed reproductive organs. Cryptogams were subdivided into four orders;

a) Filices, which includes all pteridophytes;
b) Musci which includes mosses and leafy liverworts;
c) Algae which includes algae lichens, thallose, liverworts; and
d) Fungi.

Natural System of Classification of Plants

A further increase in the list of recognized plants forced man to group plants according to their natural affinities. Grouping based on the natural affinities of plants were known as “Natural system of classification” The first such grouping was introduced by DE Jussieu. He divided the plants into three major groups,

a) Acotyledons, (without cotyledon)
b) Monocotyledons (with one cotyledons)
c) Dicotyledons (with two cotyledons).

In De Jussies classification of plants, the Acotyledons was almost equivalent to Linnaeus Cryptogamia. Besides these classifications many other systems were also proposed during first half of the nineteenth century, but they were all unsuitable for spore-producing (cryptogamin) plants.

Introduction To Charles Darwin Theory of Evolution

Charles Darwin theory of evolution introduced a new trend in classification. Every classification was based on phylogeny and thus the plants were arranged in an ascending series from the most primitive to the most complex one. The trend is still in practice while dealing with even any new classification.

In 1880 a system was introduced which subdivided the cryptogamia portion of the plants kingdom in three divisions. They were:

a) Thallophyta
b) Bryophyta
c) Pteridophyta

This system was soon taken up by the Botanists from all over the world in somewhat adopted from and is still in most of the textbooks. After the establishment of these groupings it was challenged by some workers. They argued whether or not the Thallophyta and the Pteriodophyta are two natural divisions.

Thallophytes

The Thallophytes with its two subdivisions, the Algae and Fungi may be distinguished from other plants on the basis of,

(i) They have unicellular or simple multicellular structure
(ii) They have single cell gamete and scope producing sex organs
(iii) They sex organ are never surrounded by a layer of sterile cells
(iv) The zygote never develops into a multicellular embryo while still within the female sex organ

Algae and Fungi are differentiated on the basis of their mode of nourishment, Algae is Autotrophic while fungi are heterotrophic in the mode of nourishment.

thallophytes
Thallophytes

Bryophytes

Algae are commonly found restricted to water and rarely found on the land whereas the bryophytes are land inhibited plants, but water is still required for completion of their life cycle. Thus, the Bryophytes are also known as amphibian plants. Their place of choice are swampy, muddy shade and humid places. Most of the bryophytes are autotrophic but a few exceptions include saprophytic bryophytes which grow on organic matter such as rotten wood e.g., Mnium hornum.

The in-between algae and pteridophytes the Bryophytes occupy the position. The gametophyte is highly developed and differentiated than that of complex algae. True roots are absent instead rhizoids are present.

Further classification of plants is based on the presence or absence of vascular bundles.

bryophytes
Bryophytes

Pteridophytes

Vascular bearings plants are considered to be more advanced than bryophytes. Vascular plants can be spore bearing or seed bearing. Pteridophytes occupy the intermediate position between bryophytes and seed-bearing plants, i.e., gymnosperms and angiosperms. Thus, they are the most primitive vascular plants and most advance spore bearing plants. thus, also known as “vascular cryptogams”. They are somewhat 400,000,000 years old. They were followed by seed bearing Gymnosperms and then Angiosperms evolved. All these plants were considered in a single kingdom the Plant Kingdom. Plant kingdom included all the organisms which has at least one of the two basic character supposed to be essential for an organism to be included in the plant kingdom. The characters included were: a) Having chlorophyll, b) Wall made of cellulose,

Addition of data and especially the invention of instruments and support provided by biochemistry jolted the very basis of classification. The basic mode of classification i.e., mode of nutrition was extended to accommodate some more characteristics for the classification of the life as it is. Since the middle of nineteenth century questions were raised about the classification. Third and fourth systems were added but most of the biologists either ignored these proposals or consider them unimportant curiosities.

pteridophytes
Pteridophytes

Whittaker Five Kingdom Classification System

The opinion began to change in the 1960s, largely because of the knowledge gained by the biochemical and electro-microscope techniques. The techniques revealed fundamental affinities and differences on the subcellular level that encouraged a spate of new proposal for multiple-kingdom system. A number of proposals were made but the most acceptable was extended in 1959 by R.H. Whittaker. Whittaker classification of plants and other organisms were based on five kingdoms which owe’s a great debt to the four-kingdom system of Herbert F. Copeland from Sacramento City College, California, published in 1956 mentioned below:

Whittaker-Five-Kingdom-Classification
Whittaker Five Kingdom Classification: A graphical phylogeny of life on earth based on the Whittaker five kingdom classification system and the symbiotic theory of the origin of eukaryotic cells

The Five Kingdoms

Briefly the five-kingdom system is based on the three different levels of cellular organization associated with three principals’ modes of nutrition photosynthesis, absorption and ingestion. The five-kingdom proposed consist of:

Phylogenetic-Relationship-Diagram
Phylogenetic Relationship Diagram

Kingdom Prokaryotes (Monera, or bacteria) These are prokaryotic unicellular organisms.

Kingdom Protoctista (algae, Protozoan, Slime Molds) These are eukaryotic predominately unicellular organisms. The kingdom protista examples include Euglena, and Amoeba. This kingdom also includes simple multicellular organisms that are believed to be direct descendent of unicellular protists.

Kingdom Fungi (Mushrooms, Molds, Lichens) These are eukaryotic multicellular reducers for example mushrooms. Those organisms, which are classified as heterotrophic and are absorptive in their nutritional mode are called as Fungi. Most fungi are decomposer that live on organic material, secretes digestive enzymes and absorb small organic molecules which are produced by digestion.

Kingdom Animalia (Animals with or without Back Bone) These are eukaryotic multicellular consumers. Animals live mostly by ingestion food and digesting it within specialized cavities. They lack cellulose and show free movement.

Kingdom Plantae (Mosses, Ferns, Gymnosperms and Angiosperms) These are eukaryotic multicellular autotrophs, making their own food by photosynthesis.
Here, plants are arranged with simple and most primitive in the beginning, while complex and more advanced are taken at the end. This will not only be introduced different basis knowledge about different groups of plants to the reader but also introduced the phylogenetic relationship of these groups.

Examples of Widely Distributed Equisetum Species

Equisetum-Species
Equisetum Species

Three widely distributed Equisetum species: A, Equisetum silvaticum; B, Equisetum hiemale; C, Equisetum Arvense; D and E. Underground tubers; F, spores with appendages; G, prothallus with four young sporophytes.

shares
scroll-to-top